![]() ![]() ![]() The Supreme Court’s refusal to expedite Trump’s immunity claim could make. R epublican senators criticized the Justice Department over Attorney General Merrick Garland’s new memorandum related to alleged violence and intimidation at school. Trump touts Christie’s criticism of Colorado rulingīiden orders strikes on Iranian group in Iraq after 3 US service members wounded Harvard under growing pressure over plagiarism allegations Mulvaney on Trump: 'It’s horrible to put that out on Christmas' What to know about the migrant caravan heading to the US school board meetings about mask mandates or school curriculums. House Democrat hits Trump’s ‘rot in Hell’ Christmas messageĪppeals court wipes conviction for ex-congressman This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. “It’s only about threats of violence and violence aimed at school officials, school employees and teachers.” TagsĬopyright 2023 Nexstar Media Inc. Kevin Kiley (R-CA) pressed the attorney general to immediately rescind the school board memo that was issued nearly two years ago, reiterating. “This is not about what happens inside school board meetings,” the attorney general said. In a letter sent to Garland on Monday, Rep. Garland responded to the attacks by saying the department effort has nothing to do with the issues of debate at any local school board. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) called it a “snitch line on parents” who criticize school board initiatives regarding issues like the teaching of critical race theory. Garland announced the memo earlier this month, directing FBI officials and federal prosecutors around the country to meet with local counterparts to discuss potentially criminal threats against school officials and teachers and to establish “dedicated lines of communication for threat reporting.” 4, 2021 memo issued by Attorney General Merrick Garland instructing federal law enforcement across the U.S. Republicans spent most of their allotted questioning time on Thursday pressing Garland about the memo, criticizing it as going too far and having a chilling effect on parents’ ability to weigh in on local school policies. The GOP has for roughly 18 months targeted an Oct. “I want to be clear that the Justice Department supports and defends the First Amendment right of parents to complain as vociferously as they wish about the education of their children, about the curriculum taught in the schools,” he said. In Michigan, a meeting was disrupted when a man performed a Nazi salute to protest masking.Attorney General Merrick Garland defended his office’s effort to combat a growing number of violent threats against school board members and other school employees as Republicans attacked the policy at a congressional hearing Thursday.įacing a series of angry criticisms from GOP members of the House Judiciary Committee, Garland said that the effort is intended only to make sure that debates over local education policy do not devolve into violence, and dismissed any suggestion that the Department of Justice would target parents for criticizing school boards. It cited the September arrest of an Illinois man for aggravated battery and disorderly conduct for allegedly striking a school official at a meeting. The letter documented more than 20 instances of threats, harassment, disruption, and acts of intimidation in California, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey, Ohio and other states. The association asked for the Justice Department, FBI, Homeland Security and Secret Service to help monitor threat levels and assess risks to students, educators, board members and school buildings. The original letter asked for the federal government to investigate cases where threats or violence could be handled as violations of federal laws protecting civil rights. The National School Board Association has since said “we regret and apologize” for its letter, which asked for federal assistance to combat harassment and violence against school officials and said some of the acts could be “domestic terrorism.” “No one has sent me that memo, so I haven’t seen it.” “I’ve never seen that memo,” Garland said. attorney’s office in Montana did not immediately respond to questions about whether Johnson had consulted senior Justice Department officials before issuing the memo. ![]() attorney’s memo and did not know specifics about it. Garland told senators he was never sent the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |