It feels amazing and I will continue to use it for a while. It’s still in the testing phase, but it feels better than the Brave that I use occasionally. The UI and UX are modern enough and nice enough to keep up with modern browsers. I was satisfied with the ease of use, so I imported bookmarks and adjusted the Preferences. Swarth: Modifies web pages to use a dark color scheme or based on the user’s preferences. The extensions I added are the following 3 items: Very few system resources (RAM, CPU), less than half as High efficiency (energy saving) compared to modern browsers. It’s surprisingly quick, open browser super fast (instantaneous) and responsive (less than a second). However, recently on, I learned about the milestone version Pale Moon 32.2.0 (64-bit), which piqued my interest and decided to give it a try.Ĭertainly, as written in the comment section, I realized that “remarkable evolution has been achieved”. In the past, I was interested in the milestone version Pale Moon v29 and tried it, but I gave up on continuing to use it because of the fatal inconvenience of web compatibility (cannot connect to important sites such as public sites and financial institutions). for that reason completely forgot about Pale Moon. I was a user from the first version when Pale Moon was released, but I moved to Brave from the beginning of Brave’s development, and even tried Vivaldi. You can check out the full release notes here. Fixed "several crashes related to regular expression code".This gives them a bit more space in the tab. Tab titles fade instead of using ellipses if they are too long.Removed several site-specific overrides as they are no longer required.Web text-to-speech API is now enabled by default.Filename safety improved when saving files to prevent potential environment leaks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |